Prediction of Javier Barranco Cosano [271st] vs Facundo Mena [192nd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L W L W L
Form
W W L L L L W L L LHead To Head: Cosano 2 - 0 Mena
They have played 4 sets in total, with Cosano winning 4 and Mena winning 0. The last match between Cosano and Mena was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 06-01-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Javier Barranco Cosano getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Javier Barranco Cosano | 2 |
| Facundo Mena | 0 |
| Cosano | Stats | Mena |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (7-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 38% (6-10) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 271 | Ranking | 192 |
| 211 | Highest Rank | 127 |
| 26 | Age | 32 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 15 | Titles | 15 |
| 60% (354-233) | Career Total W/L | 57% (499-376) |
| $107,105 | Career Prize Money | $140,110 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Facundo Mena
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Facundo Mena
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 13 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:21:31 | Average Match Time | 1:21:31 |
| 65% (74/114) | 1st Serve % | 54% (58/107) |
| 73% (54/74) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (42/58) |
| 57% (23/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (15/49) |
| 89% (8/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (3/9) |
| 47% (50/107) | Return Points Win % | 32% (37/114) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Javier Barranco Cosano vs Facundo Mena Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cosano 2 - 0 Mena
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cosano has won 41.87% of points on their second serve, while Mena has won 45.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cosano, in recent form, has won 48.85% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mena has won 40.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.75% and 26.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cosano has saved 53.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mena has saved 54.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cosano has won 48.21% of matches played (W/L 27/ 29), with Mena winning 63.24% (W/L 43/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cosano has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 315/ 198), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9). Mena has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Cosano has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 25/ 25), where as Mena has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.18% of matches (W/L 32/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cosano winning 2 times and Mena being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Cosano winning 4 and Mena winning 0. The last match between Cosano and Mena was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 06-01-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Javier Barranco Cosano getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:31.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cosano and Mena have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cosano winning 0 times and Mena 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cosano winning 0, and Mena 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cosano has played against opponents with an average rank of 325.84 while Mena has played against players with an average rank of 234.66.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cosano has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mena has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cosano has converted 41.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mena has converted 31.82% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Javier Barranco Cosano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
John Echeverria
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
85
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
75%
(
64 of
85)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
51%
(
44 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Iliyan Radulov
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
47%
(
51 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
86%
(
18 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Martin Klizan
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
62%
(
16 of
26)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
31
Total Points Won
27
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Facundo Mena Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Facundo Mena
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Facundo Mena
77%
(
76 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Facundo Mena
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Maximus Jones
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Facundo Mena
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Facundo Mena
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Facundo Mena
52%
(
16 of
31)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Facundo Mena
61%
(
78 of
128)
1st Serve %
56%
(
80 of
142)
4
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
1
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
56 of
80)
60%
(
30 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
41 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
51 of
142)
138
Total Points Won
132
|
7-6(8) 6-7(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Hugo Dellien
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
74%
(
25 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Federico Coria
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
14
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Cosano vs Mena?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Cosano Vs Mena is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (354/233) | Win/Loss | 57% (499/376) |
| 58% (785/565) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1100/892) |
| 53% (6683/5854) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (9552/8975) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 945 | Aces Total | 2549 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1463 | Total Double Faults | 1468 |
| 1:33:47 | Average Match Time | 1:2:10 |
| 269.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 212.37 |
| 65% (23421/35963) | 1st Serve % | 55% (20129/36924) |
| 64% (14954/23421) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (14151/20129) |
| 48% (6058/12542) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8462/16795) |
| 46% (1927/4230) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1692/3909) |
| 44% (15911/36510) | Return Points Win % | 41% (15472/37912) |
| 60% (343/571) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (495/868) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 56% (81/145) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (150/261) |
| 54% (99/184) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (142/247) |
| 87% (342/298) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (471/413) |
| 13% (342/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (471/57) |
| 22% (245/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (404/85) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
